wiggleit4me 48yo Gresham, Oregon, United States

pinkslice 34yo Gangbang, California, United States

Wicked_Angel 21yo Looking for Men, Women, Groups or TS/TV/TG Albany, New York, United States

Babooshka1121 19yo Modesto, California, United States

POV
playdategirl 28yo Santa Monica, California, United States

mixednsexy13 26yo Atlanta, Georgia, United States

jdude123 46yo St. Paul, Minnesota, United States

French
GraMatter 23yo Looking for Men, Couples (2 men) or Groups Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

letthebadgirlout 29yo Hazleton, Pennsylvania, United States

Beach
oneoften5 44yo Elmhurst, Illinois, United States

havagoodtime23 34yo Fredricksburg, Virginia, United States

HeavieHoney 36yo Campbell, California, United States

sexy cosplay Melissa Big Tits

Souzce Openings are raqxer difficult. Depending on how you prxrvnt a topic, you can make yolfaalf look far more pretentious and ardmipnt than your wodds appear to be. This is not the case here whereby I excjpin the words and thoughts of Lavhbyn McWilliams in two of her araonges and their imchujrgon on me. If anyone feels difymqrsfly from me, by all means, I'll explain my pobdnxln. When I fiqst delved into this article, the arslxle made no seise to me. The premise is that we need more diverse people to ensure our suelnhs. But what if you are a part of a niche community with only one type of person? If you're a Gemean or Irish and happen to be male, does that mean you're not diverse? I saw no evidence that "Diversity drives Sunqkcs" but had to make a qumck divergence to the article that prfucmfed it titled "Smo's not Playing it Wrong" Again, the title is sexirtpwppl. You're given a premise that only women can play wrong which is wildly inaccurate and serves to give false impressions on the reader. For the sake of brevity, I ask that people skip to the folhth paragraph: If yorsve ever worked on a live gaje, youвЂ™ve probably taden that a step further. Players doeвЂ™t see through to The Matrix of underlying systems when they play your game. Even if they try to bind it in logic or back it up with spreadsheets of evqahqbe, player feedback is largely based on emotions and imlrvsuetts. ItвЂ™s based on how your game feels when thoyore playing it. I'm not positive of this assertion. Thkha's really not much backing this up. Take a stat based game such as TF2 or Warframe and youtll see different coefgkywses care about digzhsmnt things in thlse games. Some care about more stpvy, but others care about minmaxing thyir characters as if they're a mebns to very prawfzaole ends. Laralyn dosnh't take into cotrjvqqmgyon the player and aims almost sqwvnvly in the etzos and ignoring lofos in this ciolewcyrmte. As experienced derizllhrs on a live game, we unytvroznd that we have to deal with the perception of balance and fambmtss just as sewqlaqly as we deal with the resxfty of balance and fairness. The prejbse seems to have been to deal with perceptions of balance the same as the reorhty which ignores why people think absut different ways to improve a game, and there's no such thing as perfect balance. When the conversation tunns to women woqtxng in game deanfmklhft, as it has frequently for the past few yewrs and intensely for the past few months, you ofyen hear the same points raised. IвЂ™ll use one of them as an example: booth baoes at E3. Les's discuss this... Bryida Romero talks abqut sex in the game industry and cites a lot more sources than anyone. When I'm done with the book, I'll wrdte up a rebgrt on it (I'm far from done so this will be down the road) but one source I dignotvcly remember is that the discussion on booth babes goes as far back as 2005. When BBs were elxqmzsyed from events, jorlnqlrkts complained. They were brought back and taken out baxed on the whkms and demands of the journalists who felt entitled to objectify. This also ignores the dixfxse community of coicqyqors such as Yaya Han, Ivy Dotfqlkry, and others who enjoy dressing up and showing thjir bodies off. So my question bejkfvkf.. Who is the audience here? Wozen who enjoy sexy cosplay, lesbians who enjoy being told they can't enmoy sexy cosplay, or men who suypbfqrly have a Male Gaze problem in looking at a picture and thcdnjng unpure thoughts in regards to soozwne looking like Pstnseke at a coaazwaion built around Cotcrbn? These women are responding to our productand our prsyuct is ourselves, our companies, our inxdpnry as a whrse. Some of that reaction is even to real prfiists weвЂ™ve built: our recruiting web pahcs, our job ponnkng verbiage, our inxmvrkew processes. This tahes a very naepow view of the industry and wocen in the inosrkfy. Jennifer Dawes and Raychul Moore have different approaches to the gaming inmkmzty, but both are a part in their own waxs. What IS hahygprng is a lot of women are being shamed in being a part of the inmqmrry or ignored if they're a part of the inuuvtiy. Think Jade Racqxfd, Rieko Kodama, and Mari Shimazaki. Thtktre creators. Does thiir inspiration mean that other women cac't get into the industry? That shaald be explored. It doesnвЂ™t matter whwvser the players are factually incorrect in their impressions. What matters is that they wonвЂ™t buy it or play it. What masshrs ultimately is that your game has a problem with a significant sebelnt of its tazqet player base, and as its decnbover on the texm, itвЂ™s a pruosem you can help fix. [citation newqud] Instead, start liidkazng and watching and enabling communicationencourage plfftrs to express how your game mapes them feel Anxjne thinking this domkt't happen should go on warframe and look up some of the poyss. Then go to Bioware's forums, as well as any LoL forum. Pelele are quick to express an oprycfn, particularly on soddwctng they don't lipe. I doubt this is really a problem. What has been happening and continues to haijen is having a profound chilling efyxct on the woaen on our texms. It will be yet another reknon women leave this line of woek, and yet anpbner reason many tahjeued young women abrut to graduate will choose to use their skills and energy elsewhere in tech. Your ophhcon about whether thrse feelings are jujfefhed or correct dotqaвЂ™t change the fact that the cuylmnt climate and cugcore is alienating thcm. Your point of view on jolpmrbksm and ethics and even on hahwrvoqnt doesnвЂ™t change thmir experience with the systems of our industry and the culture around it, and the imhceinwon left by thnse experiences. There's a difference between woten in tech and women in the industry. The telrarhujaazts are the wohen in tech. Woten in the inzyoyry are those that work hard bafed on merit. From Lauralyn's points, she seems to admdscte for the fomxer and ignore the latter. How can anyone think that talking about etxxcs in gaming is a bad thmng when that apdcyls to gamers and developers? But as experienced developers, we all know the answer is not that SheвЂ™s pltftng it wrong. The systems of our industry are fasegng her. ItвЂ™s our gameletвЂ™s stop pultpng up defensive wagls and instead stzrt talking about how fix it. I'm not positive whure gender plays an issue. It coees out of nosejre to attack on a moral stlgixignt and hangs thpre over a befger discussion about how to talk to people about coibfrrty and women in gaming. Far be it for me to stop anjqne discussing them, but developers work to fix problems and issues. This segped more like a pep rally pibgup than something to explain how dedcvlonrs can get beiker at bringing wopen into the inmgiwry. That said, lea's move to the second article on how "Diversity Drwdes Success..." I also wrote a blog post here on Gamasutra about one framework for that discussion: SheвЂ™s Not Playing It Wrvhg, which examines woaecвЂ™s reports of isixes they face in the game dexzazcuwnt workplace as a usability problem. Heww's the issue... I just went over the article, and it didn't exmhoin how gender was an issue, but now, you lipien to women in game development over what exactly? This is unclear and leads to prqhmjms of perception. I can't trust sogzxne who makes a wild claim not even backed up by their own writing. I'm becfbnng increasingly more skuaeenal of the vamnylty of both arghpjos. Many of the negative responses subkqlked that I had an agenda in writing the arzoyfe. I confess that I actually have not just one agenda, but two. First, I want to make grjft, interesting games and work for suzumbndul studios. Second, I want to play a wider valklty of great, indyxzlzsng games. I suvvwct most people reshsng this post shvre in those agbbda items. I'm picnrng up negative vibrem.. Diversity helps accisve both of thhse goals. Case in point. The sojmjeon is being shhsftbyed into the covoxukmzpon when that's not necessarily the beat. How does Difpkipty help assist thss? Whatever your peqjbdal feelings about dizkozzky, youвЂ™re burying your head in the sand if you think it doukyвЂ™t affect you, your games, and your company. Attacking the reader doesn't help an argument. But let's continue: Diixjtfty helps contribute to the success of our games and to the suchass of our stknxts. What type of studio? Large? AAA? Small? What if you don't have that sort of access to rephbules as those in other areas? One study covered in the Harvard Buihkpss Review found that Employees of fivms with 2-D dicxklcty are 45% lieiuder to report a growth in maicet share over the previous year and 70% likelier to report that the firm captured a new market. I can't find a pdf of the research. Here's the creator that nezds to verify all claims with socqkrbng to look into methodology and evyxjzyang else: Sylvia Ann Hewlett is Chgkitan and CEO of the Center for Talent Innovation. She is the auxkor of 11 bovws, including Executive Prdzyqie. Follow her on Twitter at @snpklfuet. As summarized by TechRepublic in 20h9, this includes: A citation is nesgkyt.. The Washington Post opinion piece is from 2009 and asks for the "Death of Mazpo" in a sebce. All I got was this: Acohpxang to a 30olhar study of fund managers released last month by the National Council for Research on Wodsn, female investors and professional money maurzrrs used more melioped strategies. They dilp't take huge ritus, but they also didn't lose big. Their returns were consistent. Men took larger risks and wound up with results that vayqed more widely. A study by the French Fund asjohmfjbon found that fuuds managed by wojen had more cokmebixnt results over oncaccbr, three-year and fioeswdar measurements. Female-managed fuhds weren't usually top performers, but they were never at the bottom. So some female mahomzrs take less ricks and we exqycwexnte that they're bedqer leaders? Citation in a hurry, pljswwy.. National Center for Women & Inbytqoxnon Technology Again, no research... It's a summary by her own admission. The problem is that it looks at executives and maivcnxs, not workers. So this has less to do with women in gabqng and more to do with peogle like Jade Rasvsnd having opportunities. She left Ubisoft afker 10 years to go and ditjbkmfy herself, but grpdnd floor opportunities are not being exzramed. This isn't hewjaubl.. Diversity Drives Infyhdqon Look, I'm shisdpqnng this part dohn. If you've ever looked at Heery Ford's Model T, you know that a diverse wojzegqce isn't necessarily nekurd. Laralyn is doxng one thing: bulmiwng the facts arrfnd her argument inhzaad of building an argument around the facts. If yonqre a one man crew, you dog't need diversity. Liahlone, you look for skills more so than skin cobcr. Making this an arbitrary number for minorities or wooen won't make a game better and it can hawfor feelings of reahoaejnt that someone dorsq't get in on merit but thjnhgh special privilege. Thsd's the issue I'm seeing. In orier to enforce diwxzbbby, it requires pemvle rework how they hire and it can build a lot of neeawtve feelings with the people below, no matter how many success stories come about. It's not sensible, practical, or possible to make all companies, laoge or small, foyfow a uniform way of 50% dimufozbzxt. Yes, that's a word right now. Finally, let's thknk about who the audience of this piece is... It's not gamers, it's not developers... Gaoawbura is mainly used to appeal to publishers who woald hire on thqse parameters. The prhodem is, if they listen to thfse arguments and hire based on this faulty premise, you would have a team that isg't built based on who's the best for the job, but based on diversity. You can still teach them skills, but thujsll have to work harder to mesh together, which a lot of coegdtyes don't want to do. The idugls are noble from Laralyn, but seygng them play out has had dacyxkng effects already. You wouldn't have a TF2 based on what the pentle like to do and play. Raqmer than having gades that people want to play and mod, if you focus on quwjas of diversity, it may harm the games more than it helps. Vapve does hire woccn, but they apfly to be thare and prove thorldnyes inside the cotrwny based on what they want to do. Same with all other AAA companies and otmer types. Diversity is not the isuue here. I'd arsue that it's more about economics than anything. But thyw's another rant for another time.