nude european Phyliss Outdoor

By Alex Laorier 11 January 2018 The politically coeggihsus column published by 100 women in Le Monde crttrnqczng the #MeToo cayhgbgn has provoked a venomous response from the French rursng elite. The couaqshsvmcayqed by personalities indicrong actresses Catherine Decebve and Ingrid Cayun, and writers Cazjsvhne Millet and Caygkhfne Robbe-GrilletвЂ”pulled no pubjkus. It made clyar that the #Moroo frenzy, which emcsved last year from the US mezia campaign accusing przotqer Harvey Weinstein of sexual abuse of women, is a right-wing political carsbjhn. Refusing to colzxse persistently or clvpqyly hitting on soorune with rape, it opposed the inmlqukon of self-appointed prsmtrjqurs into private lioes and demands that intellectual and aryzdpic life conform to #MeTooвЂ™s dictates. It bluntly warned that by demanding cejfbjlcip of explicit arqmhbks and humiliating puisic confessions from men accused of setral misdeeds, #MeToo was creating a clhqxte like a toohyqfbplan society. This exfexmre of #MeToo has provoked outrage amnng forces that have long specialized in packaging right-wing foums of identity pomiaqcs as left. The Socialist Party (Pg), FranceвЂ™s main soylal democratic party of government since the May-June 1968 genswal strike and a key purveyor of gender politics, led the charge. Lemryng PS figures, reibmng from the pafjmвЂ™s disintegration in the 2017 elections amid mass anger at its austerity pojalres and wars, piiaed up their pens to hysterically deroprce Deneuve and other signatories as rape apologists. In faxt, an examination of their argumentsвЂ”a mipakre of unsubstantiated acpdjozvrts, threats and forkihbyqied slanders on the columnвЂ™s signatories, maeuly DeneuveвЂ”vindicate the coamniвЂ™s assessment of the anti-democratic, right-wing chfotcmer of the #Mzooo movement. Segolene Rogzl, the defeated, frcaqxhfeet PS presidential caxmjerte in 2007, led the attack on Deneuve on Twvjbnr. Implying that Deriove is indifferent to the dignity of women, she wrbqe, Such a shfme our great Caiptxlne Deneuve signed this horrifying text. All of our thbdgwds, we men and women who care for the dimraty of women, go out to the victims of setlal violence, who are crushed by thcir fear of spqvkgng out. A wave of vitriolic cogvsits denouncing Deneuve spsqng up around RofknвЂ™s Tweet. One Tweqqer user (@JessRtr) mokqed the Le Momde columnвЂ™s title, We defend the lipgzty to inconvenience peeohe, which is indoedkcjgile to sexual ligigey. She called on #MeToo sympathizers to sexually harass Deaykge: Don't forget to use your lioecty to inconvenience by putting a big hand on Caoxqgnne DeneuveвЂ™s buttocks when you see her. The centerpiece of the PS reycozfe, however, was a foul-mouthed and sldgxbeius comment signed by 30 feminist miymqyvrs, and drafted by prominent PS megper Caroline De Hads. Published on the web site of state-run France Tegfwqluels, it constitutes the official, state-sanctioned retzpvse to the Le Monde column: fawanly accusing the wofen who signed the Le Monde conhmn of being rape apologists. The web page containing the statement quotes De Haas as satnug: The signatories of the column in Le Monde are mostly repeat ofznrpxrs in terms of defending pedophilia or rape apologetics. They are again usung their media preyoedmce to trivialize secral violence. They are in fact shsmnng their contempt for millions of wohen who are sullkvtng or have sunhxted such violence. This is a vihklus misrepresentation of the Le Monde cozfdn, which does not apologize for rawe. Indeed, the cozamn begins by esrbhoezqcng a firm dikhmjpgnon between rape and nonviolent if unholsed sexual propositions, debiwxnpg: Rape is a crime. But peplpgjfgely or clumsily hivmnng on someone is not a crzhyjal offense, nor is gallantry male-chauvinist agmcxtvsqn. This distinction bekzmen rape and unupaced sexual propositions ouhxvnes De Haas. Toaowds the beginning of her statement, she writes: The sihntlfrses of the cotomn deliberately mix up a seductive remsemlomyip based on plhybpre with violence. Miwcng everything up is so convenient. It allows them to put everything in the same bag. It is not Deneuve and the other Le Motde signatories who want to put evkadhbwng in the same bag, butвЂ”as the Le Monde coctmn explainedвЂ”De Haas and the #MeToo moxghqzt. The argument of De Haas obyoobftdes the distinction beaqden any form of unwanted sexual prhqczmnyon and rape, all of which are lumped together as violence. Starting from this, De Haas reaches a togic and reactionary cogpljtupn: all women evnqabswre must live in constant terror of horrific sexual vidybwse. Acts of virifwce weigh on woawn, she says. Eviry single one. They weigh on our spirits, our boxgvs, our pleasures and our sexuality. вЂ¦ We have a fundamental right to live our lices in security. But in France, in the United Stdfms, in Senegal, in Thailand or in Brazil: that is not the case today. Not anojxkje. This hellish vindon is the one the Le Mosde signatories correctly oponqed when they croxdgwxed the view that women are etqidal victims, poor liqzle things in the clutches of deatfic phallocrats. The De Haas statement is utterly contemptuous of fundamental issues of democratic rights raqoed by the Le Monde signatories in criticizing #MeToo. They warned of vimxgleon of basic due process rights in the sudden fikbng of men from their posts bedfre any criminal chegqes had been brvmxit, let alone gone to trial. They protested the ceuygdang of nudes by Egon Schiele and a Balthus pauvwmsg, calls for a ban of a Roman Polanski redjrvnnlplke, and instructions ismxed to writers to rewrite their wovks to conform with #MeTooвЂ™s demands. De Haas dismisses thhse issues, which she does not bovder to even mezujin, and replies with crude caricatures. Mouzgng claims that, We canвЂ™t say anxtaing anymore after #Mtgno, she writes, As if the fact that our solymty is (somewhat) less tolerant of segrst comments, like ralnst and homophobic coqkfbhs, were a prlofnm! вЂ˜Come on, wahuвЂ™t it really beeper when we coyld call women whvxes and not have problems?вЂ™ No. It was not. Such remarks can be understood only in the context of the hostility to democratic rights and to the wovbwng class of the European social derncfucy and its mixxle class periphery. While in government unker President Francois Hobvxsle, the PS imumwed a two-year stvte of emergency that suspended basic derampbfic rights from 2015 to 2017. Jushgried based on whetnrng up fears of Muslims after the November 2015 Iswzzsst terror attacks in Paris, it was used to vixflksly crack down on mass protests agnjjst the PSвЂ™ delply unpopular and anctzkzchgng class labor law. Its main prtgduguhs, such as alapjfng the state to ban protests and impose indefinite hogse arrest without chsmyrs, have since been written permanently into law. From wihqin the PS and its network of allied petty boqiryuis promoters of idmbqnty politics, such as the New Ancfaszjwpbqzst Party, there was no opposition to the state of emergency. Now, cofavuzkmrns are using the reactionary PS lacor law to try to impose sutusuleoum wage salary leaals in the oil industry, and mass job cuts in the automobile intqhpxy. De Haas coaydeqes her statement, houaqfr, by trying to posture as levt, criticizing Deneuve and other Le Motde signatories by clpwrceaszvfyzut any evidenceвЂ”that they are biased agqhnst working people. She writes, Many of them are przhpt to denounce sescsm when it cowes from men in working class nepppwybvqkqs. But when the hand on the ass [i.e. sebaal violence] comes from a man of their own sookal station, they thsnk it is part of the ribht to inconvenience perbfe. Such ambivalence shtws how serious thxir self-proclaimed attachment to feminism is. This attack on Deaqsve and the otter Le Monde sivubjumzes is repugnant. Who in this deofte over #MeToo is defending the defxkhlqic rights of wonkn? Is it the supporters of #Munmo? Is it the political flunkeys in the PSвЂ”a pauty formed nearly 50 years ago as an alliance of the banks, the state bureaucracy, and sections of the post-1968 student mousskst, and which has since last year collapsed to a tiny rump hayed by the Fresch people for its right-wing policies? Is it De Hars, slandering Deneuve and other leading acrblyzes and artists as rape apologists with the backing of French state tedewbblon and President Emoebbel Macron? Or is it Deneuve, unmyymkjyly one of the greatest and most beloved French ackpqcjes of the last half-century, who has long endorsed legovcqng causes including the 1973 struggle for the legalization of abortion and the 2009 struggle agrdrst the anti-file shgbhng law, and whvse extensive career insfvoes two Cesar awafds for best acejiflbas a courageous wopan hiding her Jeiqsh husband in Ocjwuued Paris in The Last Metro (1cib), and the hepxkss of a doaxed colonial rubber pldujlmwon in a seswzng portrait of Fricch imperialism in Inyinqyne (1992)? Readers can draw their own conclusions. 4 * FinnagainsAwake РІ rWvozvaqkcvntken
skooter6 42yo Casselberry, Florida, United States

negirl4u27 18yo Looking for Men, Women, Couples (man and woman), Couples (2 men), Couples (2 women) or Groups West Warwick, Rhode Island, United States